Keeping up with the BGNlab
Search the Site

Participate in a Research Study


Seeking Research Subjects

We are seeking participants 18 years and older who are willing to work with an activity we have created online, answer questions immediately afterwards, and then answer follow-up surveys through e-mail.  This call will be open until November 26th.

 The process should take about an hour, and each of 4 follow-up surveys will take no more than 15 minutes each over the next 12 months. You can opt out of the research at any time. You will need to use a computer, as these activities may not work well on a mobile device.

If you have questions, you can contact Dr. Scott Nicholson at or at 519.756.8228x5893.  This research has been approved by the Wilfrid Laurier University Research Ethics Board, study: REB #5400.


First – Read and complete the Informed Consent document then return here.

Second - Write down the time you are starting, then visit the link below on a computer to participate in a randomly selected activity (some activities won't work well on a mobile device). Note that it may take a little while to load.

When finished, write down the time you finished and then return here for the follow-up survey.

Thank you very much!  We will contact you in about a month with the first follow-up survey.

Seeking research sites

We are currently doing comparative research between games and information resources about Climate Change funded by the Government of Ontario.    We are seeking research sites between the GTA, KW, London, Niagara Falls, and all points between to visit in order to carry out our project.

Our goal is to have 18-30 year olds work through either a game or an information resource about climate change.  We'd are seeking places like libraries, museums, festivals, or other places where 18-30 year olds visit. 

What we need is a place for up to 10 people at the same time to sit and do a survey, work through a 20-minute activity on a tablet, and do another survey.  We'd like to be able to be in that space for at least 3 hours.   We are looking to do most of this research in October and November.

If you are at a location that could host us for a day to help us do research to see if we can change people's behavior around Climate Change issues, please contact Emily Flynn-Jones at 


Free Play Friday starting back up!

Now that the semester has started, it’s also time to get our Free Play Friday events up and going at the BGNlab.  This will be a weekly event, so you can plan on coming to the lab any Friday for a few games.

You are invited to come to the lab on Fridays from 3-6pm to play some games with us!   We have student volunteers who will be available to help you find games and other players for those games.

Please note – those 16 and under need to be accompanied by an adult.


For directions and more information, visit



Scott Nicholson



GameTalk on Sept. 14

Time to get this semester rolling!

Join us on Thursday, September 14th for our first Game Talk of the semester in partnership with Michelle Goodridge and the WLU Libraries.  Board Game Designer Sen-Foong Lim will be joining us to talk about his adventures in creating games and tips about making better board games!  

Sen-Foong Lim who is a professor at Fanshawe College and is a board game designer and half of the Bamboozle Brothers ( who designed Junk Art and Belfort, and they've also been heavily involved with intellectual property work, designing games for the D&D license, Orphan Black, and The Godfather.

You can also add the other Game Talk events to your calender - Oct. 5, Nov. 2, and Dec. 7.


If you would like to join us, you'll find directions to the BGNlab in the tabs at the top of this page! 




Climate Change Project Wrap Up

By @StephanReilly

This week we wrap up development of our Climate Change game for the Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC). We started this project 12 weeks ago with a team of students from schools across Ontario. Artists, programmers and designers all came together to develop a series of minigames that each taught the player a small way they could reduce their emissions and save the planet. The ultimate goal of the project was to create a digital prototype from which we could conduct research to see if:

a) games are an effective way to effect behavioural change related to people’s emissions and

b) if yes, does putting these games in the context of a Climate Change narrative reduce their effectiveness as opposed to just playing the minigames themselves?

What We Did:

We started development by breaking up into smaller teams and brainstorming minigames ideas related to the four main areas that MOECC wanted us to focus on: Consumption, Energy, Food and Travel. We approached the design of these minigames by first asking what survey question we could ask the player to see if the game had an effect. We then created a physical prototype to quickly test if these games are engaging and effectively impart the lesson.

Photo courtesy of Laurier University.

We then moved into digital prototyping after selecting 12 minigames we wanted to create. Our designers wrote the designs in a shared team design document from which the programmers read and created the digital prototypes. In this stage we could begin playtesting our digital prototypes to see what was working and what wasn’t. Unfortunately some minigames didn’t make the cut, and after some feedback from the MOECC we reduced the scope of our game from 12 minigames to 8 minigames, 3 for each area the ministry wanted us to focus on.

Development continued with design playtesting digital prototypes, giving feedback to programming and iterating. Art team was creating higher quality assets then the scribbles that programming had put in place for the purposes of testing functionality. And parallel to this we were developing the research proposal, survey questions, ethics approval and research process so we can begin testing in the fall.

We also developed two version of the game, each one with the same set of minigames but one had a narrative about Climate Change and the end of the world in the year 2100 while the other simply had the minigames and a cute animal theme. We named these versions 6 Degrees and Casual Critters respectively. This way we can test to see which version is more effective and whether the narrative context helps or hinders learning.

What We Learned:

Pretty unanimously across programming and art teams we learned the game engine we had selected to develop our project, Construct 2, wasn’t the best for what we were trying to do. This visual based engine wasn’t very accommodating for multiple users to work on the project simultaneously which later in development when we were compiling all the minigames into one build was problematic, as the minigames had all been developed separately by our programmers. Our programmers felt a little handcuffed by the limitations of the engine as they’re used to other more flexible game engines.

Photo courtesy of Laurier University.

We also learned a great deal about game development and team work. For many of us this was our first time working on a game project with such a large team size, developing a game for a client. We ran into a few hiccups with communication and for a couple team members their inexperience led to some things having to be redone several times.

What’s Next:

Moving into the Fall two students on our team will be sticking around to help conduct, parse through and write up our research. We’ll be travelling to schools and libraries across Ontario looking for participants so stay tuned. Depending on the results of our research we may end up developing this game into a fully polished game released to the public. We’re excited to see what’s next and we’ll keep you updated here and on our YouTube channel.

Check out our development videos over on our YouTube and keep up with our space on Twitter!